How do you define Capitalism, Socialism and Communism in one line?
你如何定义资本主义，社会主义和共产主义？
Jake Jacobsen, Voluntaryist Libertarian
Jake Jacobsen，一位自发自由主义者
Written Oct 7
Capitalism is the private ownership of the means of production, while socialism is the communal or government ownership of the means of production, and communism is the communal ownership of the means of production in an envisioned stateless, moneyless, classless, post-scarcity society.
资本主义是以生产资料所有权私有制的，而共产主义则是生产资料归有国家和集体的。同时共产主义的集体权利的定义更是假定在跨国籍无国界，有分工无贵贱的物质极大丰富的社会。
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Gregory Norton, Engineer with interests in economics and the Philosophy of Liberty
Gregory Norton,一个对自由经济和自由哲学感兴趣的工程师
Written Oct 7
Capitalism provides people with what they want, Socialism provides people with what government planners think they should want, Communism doesn’t work unless people are redesigned.
资本主义提供人民所需的东西，社会主义给人民的是政府认为人民需要的东西，而共产主义目前不管用，除非人民的思想和观念发生改变。
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Nicholas Kubley, Politics is complicated in theory, and in practice, it's more complicated
Noicholas Kubley，政治是一门复杂的理论，通过实践，他变得更复杂了。
Written Oct 13
In theory:
Capitalism - The best way to work with exploitation is to allow anyone to do it, too.
Socialism - The best way to stop exploitation is to have something, such as government, assuring fairness.
Communism - The best way to avoid exploitation is to not need exploitation.
In practice:
Capitalism - Business exploits, blaming government.
Socialism - Business and government exploits, blaming each other.
Communism - Government exploits, blaming business.
But there are many forms of each, remember that. Some forms of communism have no government, and some forms of capitalism require government. It’s not that simple.
在理论上
资本主义-允许任何人使用剥削的最佳方式
社会主义-禁止一些机构例如政府以剥削去得到一些东西以确保公平的最佳方式。
共产主义-天下大同
在实践中
资本主义-商业性的剥削，政府被指责。
社会主义-ZF和商业的剥削，互相推诿。（奸笑看马云爸爸）
共产主义-ZF剥削，指责商业。
当然，也不能一概而论，一些共产主义的经济需要自由市场调节，一些资本主义的经济同样需要经济经济去调节，这绝对不是一个简单的概念。
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Caite McMullan, Member of a UK political party
Caite McMullan,一位英国政治党派的成员
Written Oct 7
Capitalism: When life gives you lemons, make lemonade, privatise the lemonade and then sell the lemonade at extortionate prices and then use that money to buy more lemon trees.
Socialism: When life gives you lemons, nationalise the lemons and share them out among your friends so they can use those lemons however they please.
Communism: Free lemonade for all!
资本主义：当你有一些个柠檬，把它们作成柠檬汁，这私有的柠檬汁，你可以拿它们以欺诈的价格卖钱，最后获得利润卖更多的柠檬树。
社会主义：当你有一些个柠檬，国有化它们，这样你的朋友们就可以分享这些柠檬并且拿着这些他们做任何想做的事情
共产主义：柠檬汁免费供应
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Nguyen Quoc Huy, Busting Right-wing myth since 2013
Nguyen Quoc Huy,正在破坏右翼的神话
Written Oct 7
Many peoples who doesn’t know anything about the ideology answer the question and speak of it as if they know it so well , I’ll give my opinion:
Capitalism:When you make other peoples do stuffs for you and you profit from their work , Socialize the risk.
Socialism:When you work together to produce stuff and profit together if you success , if.
Communism:When you produce stuffs for no financial incentives , just for self-sufficiency or communal support.
很多人在作答时并没有理解意识形态或者并没有了解透彻，那么我将要给出我的答案：
资本主义-当你让别人为你做东西，你从他们的劳动中获利，并且将风险社会化。
社会主义-你们一起工作一起获利，但前提如果你们是成功的。
共产主义：你们不为任何经济利益去做生产，仅仅为了满足个人需求和集体支持。
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Ian Burns, works at Georgian American School
Ian Burns,就职于格鲁吉亚的美国学校
Written Jan 20
Capitalism: I have a rich daddy. You work at Wallmart. I own you.
Socialism: My rich daddy’s rich, but the government makes us pay you a living wage and will steal all my inheritance.
Communism: Stalin killed by rich daddy. We all work at Stalinmart.
资本主义：我有一个有钱的亲爹，你在沃尔玛超市工作，那么我就拥有你。
社会主义：我有个有钱的亲爹，但是ZF要求我们付你们的生活费同时试图夺取我所有的继承权。
共产主义-有钱爹都被斯大林干掉了，我们都得去斯大林玛超市工作。
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Panos Shady, Governent and Politics student.
Panos Shady,政策政治系学生
Written Oct 7
Capitalism: I worked harder and smarter than you so I have 2 coats and you have none since you were lazy.
Socialism: I worked harder and smarter than you but we both have 1 coat since even though you were lazy, the government thinks we should be equals.
Communism: (the economic application of socialism) Everyone gets a coat once the workers-owned inefficient firms actually manage to produce them.
资本主义：我努力工作而且比你聪明，所以我有两件大衣，而你因为懒惰什么都没有。
社会主义：我努力工作而且比你聪明，但是我们都只有一件大衣，因为ZF认为我们需要公平
共产主义：（在社会主义经济的框架下）所有人都会同时从一个低效率的集体公司得到一件大衣，而这家公司已经开始计划生产他们了。
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Callum P. Stuart, Anarcho-Communist
Callum P.Stuart,无政府主义的共产主义者
Updated Jan 25
Capitalism - Taxation is theft! The free market can do anything better than gummint, dagnabit!
Socialism - Those who work in the mills ought to own them.
Communism - Let’s get rid of all these stupid hierarchies and collectively make decisions, comrade?
资本主义：税收就是窃贼！由市场可以比这些狗屎做的更好。
社会主义：工人们工作同时也应拥有工厂。
共产主义：同志们，让我们摆脱这些愚蠢的层级结构，共同决定政策。
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Joshua Eric Turcotte, studied at University of Maine
Joshua Eric Turcotte，就读于缅因大学
Written Oct 13
This is a tough one, in part because you are talking about overlapping concepts as if they were distinct… I could do each in one word (and sound more accusatory than is meant) or in more than one short sentence each. Maybe I’ll try the ‘cow’ thing someone else (who got it hilariously wrong) did.
Capitalism — Get as many cows as possible, whether by hard work or by mass exploitation… you’ll only be judged on how many, even it’s vastly more than you could ever humanly use yourself.
Socialism — We set aside a small percentage of the cow’s milk to raise the funds needed to hire some folk to maintain paths that make raising cows less risky and more fruitful.
Communism — Here’s now many cows and much cow milk we have, so let’s cooperate on their care and make sure everyone has access to their products.
The main flaw in the question is that you assert that they are separate… but they are not. Capitalism doesn’t function well without a socialist framework providing the means by which to seek and sequester capital… and modern communist states do the same, while also frolicking in capitalism, too.
You’d have more luck trying to define successful and unsuccessful combinations of these various things and trying to understand how their combinations did or did not work.
这是一个很难的问题，这些概念是不同但是在一些部分中他们又是一个一个衔接的概念，当然我也可以用一个词或者一句话去总结每一个概念。但是在这我会以奶牛作为例子进行解释（尽管这种做法是及其可笑的。）
资本主义：尽可能多获得奶牛，不论通过你勤劳的工作还是资本注入。最终评定都会以奶牛数量的多少来裁定。即使它的数量多的已经超过人类所需要的使用量。
社会主义：我们设定一定比例的奶牛作为储备，并且雇佣一些工人养殖奶牛，以规避可能提高的奶牛风险和奶牛高效率生产。
社会主义：奶牛和牛奶的资源现在已经极大的富足了，现在的目的是让每一个人都能获得他们需要的奶制品。
这问题的主要缺陷在于你看来他们是独立分开的概念，但他们并不是。资本主义不能在缺失社会主义的提供的经济框架下寻找到稳定可靠的资本，而现代的共产主义国家也是同样的情况，他们也离不开他们嗤之以鼻的资本主义。
我们已经比以往有更有幸的去定义很多成功和不成功的组合，并试图去了解和分析他们这些组合为什么运作成功和不成功的原因。
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Ian Rae, Member of the WSM (SPGB), read Marx Capital vol1,2,3 and Essential Marx.
Ian Rae,不可描述的头衔
Written Oct 7
Capitalism is where production is carried out with a view to profit, S/C is where production is for use a moneyless , stateless , wageless , classless society, for more info visit www.worldsocialism.org / spgb regards ian.
一个政治性网站的广告，语言略带煽动。
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Bárbara Diniz, studied at Federal University of Minas Gerais
Barbara Diniz，就读于迈阿密联邦大学
Written Nov 25
I’ll need a little more than a single line:
Capitalism: An economic regime in which a few people own the means of production and rent wage labour by a smaller value than it’s worth. Production’s goal is profit.
Socialism: An umbrella name for a wide range of left wing schools of thought; a Socialist State or government is one that supposedly applies one of those. It’s possible for a country to have a socialist government and a capitalist economic system.
Communism: An utopia in which the means of production are communal, there’s no government, no bosses, no class differences, everyone works only as much as they can, and everyone receives what they need. It might also be used as a different name for Marxist Socialism.
Obs.: Some of the other answers imply that Capitalism is the system in which the best worker gets the best results. That’s called meritocracy, not capitalism. Some socialist and liberal currents try to reform Capitalism in order to achieve that. Either way, a Capitalist society might either have rigid class systems that ensures the same people are always on top, no matter what they do, or it might have great social mobility, that lets poor, hard-working people become rich while lazy, stupid heirs become poor. It’s not a Capitalist feature, unless in relative terms when compared to Feudalism.
对于这个问题简单的一行话是说不清楚的。
资本主义：以获利为目的，少数人拥有生产资料，并以极低的工资租用劳动力的一种经济制度。
社会主义：广大的左翼分子学术思想的统称。社会主义国家或者政府必须以此为做执政纲领，同时这个国家也可能存在社会主义政府和资本主义经济的系统。
共产主义：一个乌托邦型的社会。生产资料都是公有的，这里没有政府，没有领导，没有等级划分。所有人都为社会尽可能多的贡献自己的力量，同时每个人也都会得到自己想要的东西，这个理论也被称为马克思社会主义。
附言：前面的一些回答中，都或多或少的暗示了资本主义优于其他主义的，也就是优秀的工人能够获得更好的回报。这并不是资本主义而是精英主义。一些社会主义者和自由主义者试图改造资本主义，但是无论如何革新，资本主义都是一种僵化的政治阶级制度，他的存在确保了一小部分总是存在于社会的顶部，或者说他也存在与封建社会不同的伟大社会阶级流动性，他可以是穷苦的勤劳人变得富有，同时使懒惰和愚蠢的富裕的继承者们变得贫穷。但这并不是资本主义的特质。
网友评论