我把《断剑—中途岛海战尚不为人知的真相》和《中途岛海战》两本书放在一起对比阅读，发现源田美津雄所著的《中途岛海战》并不是一本客观的作品。源田美津雄并没有完全阐述事实，他对事实畸形了刻意的扭曲，利用他作为一个历史事件的亲身见证者的身份，误导了后人对当时真相的了解，直接影响了人们对中途岛海战这一历史的认知。
By comparing <Shattered Sword-The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway> and <Battle of Midway>, I found that the <Battle of Midway>, written by Futida Mitsuo, was not written from an objective view; Futida Mitsuo did not describe all facts, intentionally distorted some of them and use his identity as a witness of the Battle of Midway, mislead people’s understanding of that part of history, which directly influenced people’s opinion about the true history of the Battle of Midway
我认为，源田美津雄对于上述所作所为是刻意为之，传承了日本军人在二战中表现出的军种之间的互相倾轧一贯做法。是中途岛海战后，日本海军编造了一些理由粉饰了自己的重大失误的历史延续。
From my perspective, Futida Mitsuo intentionally did all these things, which inherit the most common way that Japanese soldiers did in WWII. After the Battle of Midway, the Imperial of Japanese Navy made up several reasons to cover up the huge mistake that they made in real history.
日本军人在二战中，从不直面自己的失败，对于错误和自身的问题从来都采取回避的态度，这种虚伪思维方式和由此引起的盲目的民族自豪感是日本二战失败的重要原因之一。
In WWII, Japanese soldiers didn’t want to face their mistakes and avoid personal problems that they have created. This kind of hypocritical ideology and blindness national pride are the main reasons why the Imperial of Japan failed in WWII.
源田美津雄作为日本海军的重要人员，抢先发表了关于中途岛海战的回忆录，让其成为了评价这场战役的最权威人士，同时避免了自己对战役失败承担任何责任。这部回忆录中阐述的日本海军行动的某些精彩瞬间满足了日本的民族自豪感，掩饰其作战不力的真相，但是让全世界对于这一战争历史的真相了解延迟了将半个世纪的时间。
Futida Mitsuo, as an important person in Imperial of Japanese Navy, was the first people who wrote memoir about the Battle of Midway, making him to be the man who has the highest authority and avoiding all responsibilities that he has to take. This memoir described some exited part in the Battle of Midway and fulfill Japanese people’s national pride, concealing the truth of low efficiency in real battle.
网友评论