These things were all destroyed, and after they were destroyed, of course, we never thought that we were closely integrated with the pattern. I feel homeless now. I personally feel that many of my ideas were connected in the Shanghai where I grew up, including the Shanghai that extends upwards, but now Shanghai no longer exists.
I don't know, there are too many people like me, what else can we do?
I don't think this is our Shanghai. You can't even imagine the original Shanghai. On Kangping Road, this is a Spanish style detached villa, next to the so-called houses of the most local grassroots in China, a large courtyard, all of which are bungalows. The bungalow is made of bamboo, bricks, and wooden blocks. In the summer, a child can enjoy the cool breeze, which is very reminiscent of the world of life. In the middle is a courtyard, and in the summer, if you drop a watermelon inside, it tastes even better than opening it in the refrigerator. Then, you feel that this kind of life is strangely paired together.
Sorry now, the working people have moved to places where birds don't defecate. There are no living facilities around. Speaking of places, I can improve your living environment and let you go, but there is no popularity. You even want the Americans to teach us a lesson. You can move, but the human touch between people is gone. We are now living in a single apartment with two households and one household living alone. The fewer households, the more upscale the house you live in.
However, Shanghai, which used to have a human touch, is no longer there. And only then did I realize that the original Shanghai was not the kind of harm we imagined, a complete isolation between the rich and the poor. This is a very complex phenomenon that you cannot see anymore, and what we see now is due to data destruction.
You must be vigilant, each and every one of us must be wary of our beastly nature. Why is Fudan University losing a lot of information? These guys who studied here more than 30 years ago, they destroyed it. Speaking of which, they also scored in the college entrance examination. At that time, it was much harder to get into a university because there were fewer applicants.
Culture and civilization are completely different concepts. People with culture do evil, and they are even worse than those without culture. They know that often they destroy things, things that you can no longer repair. They take action against you and completely destroy them. Why are you going to our school now? Why are there not all the magazines we had before the liberation? It turns out that they were all on the computer and on the cards, but there are none. Why are they gone? They were destroyed by the group of people who studied here more than thirty years ago.
We all need to be vigilant about our beastly nature. If we are not vigilant about these things, we will destroy them and continue to do so from generation to generation. The problem is not just about me, the so-called 'I am different' means that people are divided, and then in the universe, I am the only one in the sky and earth. This kind of person at this moment is too terrifying.
In fact, Hegel's path ultimately requires overcoming Kant's dualism. His path comes from Aristotle, and I mean his path of monism is from Aristotle, who represents the ancient world's understanding of problems. Don't think that this is a philosophical proposition, not a philosophical proposition. He doesn't know philosophy about those real estate developers, but when you ask him if the world is subject and object, he says of course it is.
I have little to do with the world. The world is something I can transform, as our professors at the Party School have said. We conquer nature and transform it to serve the people. He is like a real estate developer who can sit together and discuss the country.
I think no matter what, we must always remember that even if we cannot recover today, we must tell future generations. There was such an event before, and it should be told to him like this, otherwise future generations may even think.
This group of people, because if we don't talk about it, future generations won't know. They think the world is like this.
I feel embarrassed to say that because my student is in his thirties, he brought a child and got an iPad for him at the age of three. This is not right. His child is one of two professors' children, and he is different from ordinary children. He doesn't use an iPad to play games, but rather to attack the other party with missiles. He mainly listens to stories.
Stories should be told by mothers, there are many choices here, and there are only a few stories about mothers that are not told in this way. He felt that there were hundreds of stories inside for him to choose from. Until today, when do you meet a German family with an old middle class? Ask them that they are in a better position. They have always slept in the sound of their parents' schooling since childhood. This is a living habit of Germans. Today's Germans are relatively civilized.
I'm not very conscious, I think because my student is also in their thirties or eighties, and I want both husband and wife to be in front of me. When I speak, they may not be able to hold back their faces, and he may treat them as very gentle and won't confront your teacher in person. However, they may feel difficult to say in their hearts, but the problem is very obvious. When he was eating, he took it out with a loud bang, which was very scary. The child he recognized would never think of digging a well in the middle of the house and setting up a fan around it to cool off in the future. A few friends is a great way of life with a unique atmosphere. Only those who have experienced it, with a good atmosphere, are better than us installing air conditioning now.
Kant's question of freedom is divided into two parts: as nature, we are not free. Because we are natural beings, but as actors and moral individuals, we are free.
In his view, all previous metaphysics was based on a priori fantasies, therefore, the problems of traditional metaphysics were only incorrectly raised. Furthermore, a firm belief in philosophy and reason inevitably leads to the existence of God, which is considered an irreparable direction, and we have no theoretical knowledge of God at all.
Kant proposed that I have to choose knowledge, and we still need it now.
Although Kant's metaphysical form is only an entry into the problem, the origin of his critical philosophy largely stems from moral issues. This is the quote by Quinn, who wrote the biography of Kant. He said that the beginning of his critical philosophy largely stems from moral issues.
It is different from that of our Chinese people, because until today, most of the academic circles have talked about Kant's problem. You see, at least his origins should have started with epistemological issues.
Kant's first metaphysics concerns both natural science and humanity. Metaphysics seems to be divided into two parts in his view. Firstly, he said that metaphysics is human nature. However, if metaphysics needs to be further distinguished, it can be divided into two parts, namely natural metaphysics and moral metaphysics.
Natural metaphysics and moral metaphysics should be the same issue, their difference lies in the different movements of reason, with the former being a purely rational speculative movement. Kant called him pure rational speculative metaphysics, natural metaphysics. Moral Metaphysics is the application of practical rationality in practice.
Natural metaphysics is a speculative movement of pure reason, while Moral Metaphysics is the practical application of pure reason. These two metaphysics sound like. It seems to be evenly distributed. Nature is our rational speculative application, and morality is our rational practical application, these are two different parts.
Actually, it's not. In Kant's view, both theory and practice are important. Remember that Westerners accept us Chinese people differently in terms of problems. Local metaphysics has traditionally taken morality as its ultimate goal since Plato, and so have modern philosophers.
Descartes believed that the fundamental purpose of philosophy is two words, the ultimate good. Like Plato and Aristotle, what does philosophy ultimately pursue?
The ultimate truth and goodness, he is above life. Kant, on the other hand, believed that 'when nature arranges our reason, its ultimate intention is inherently moral'.
When nature arranges rationality, when it arranges our rationality, it says that the ultimate intention was originally placed on morality, not that nature arranges such an objective world, but the ultimate intention is placed on morality.
This point has been completely forgotten by Western philosophers. Nowadays, it is believed that there is only one type of philosopher called moral philosopher, and the others are irrelevant. Most of the current philosophies do not deal with problems, and you need to know why?
Because ancient philosophers, or classical philosophers, were first individuals and then philosophers, while today we are first philosophy professors and then people, this is not correct. So, the so-called philosophers nowadays can be even less concerned about human issues. They think that as long as I do a good job with the professor's affairs, it's enough.
So, the things written by Zhongzhe now have no one inside, they are all below zero degrees. So, after liberation, people today don't have to look at what they write. You need to see second-hand works written by people before 1911. Works, that's called second-hand works, have a bit of warmth, but what I write now doesn't have warmth, I don't know what I'm talking about.
Mr. Hong Qian taught me at that time that a late Mr. Hong Qian from Peking University said that to become a philosopher, one must first have a compassionate heart. Compassionate towards heaven and people, you are not, you are not personal enough, what kind of philosopher are you. We often have people like this who have very good brains. They will analyze, argue, and play around with you, but that's the only thing. You can't feel his warmth in his whole body. This is our philosophy today.
You are reading books by modern philosophers now, which is different from reading Kant and Hegel. They are about the righteous energy of heaven and earth. Many undergraduate students ask me, 'Teacher, I am from a foreign department. What should I study philosophy for?'? I said you shouldn't read any Introduction to Philosophy. It's something you can't read. After reading it, you won't be able to enter the door of philosophy from now on.
If you want to enter the door of philosophy, you can start with Plato or Aristotle. It doesn't matter if you don't understand a word of that thing, but you do understand the righteousness of heaven and earth, because obviously, it's different from what professors write now. He has a sense of righteousness in the world, which is different. Only when you have it will you know what true philosophy is, what false philosophy is, and what deceitful philosophy is.
网友评论