I now see some things related to justice, called experts who study science or statistics, to argue and make decisions when consulting. You already know that things are not going well, because he is only using this set of thinking. Because as I told you last time, the old man who was a member of the CPPCC Standing Committee more than a decade ago is a medical expert who has been teaching for a lifetime. However, theoretically speaking, doctors should have benevolent hearts and skills. He doesn't have any. What does he believe in?
Money is natural and reasonable. If you have money, you should have someone to take care of you. If you don't have money, you deserve it. Whoever says you don't have money believes it, and under the banner of reform.
We have already seen the practice of using natural science theories to explain human moral behavior in contemporary China. Last time in France, I said that moral behavior is entirely related to the movement of the brain. If that were the case, it would be a cancellation of understanding human behavior purely as a result of physiological and psychological mechanisms.
For Kant, knowledge is not a guide to morality, but rather serves morality. You may lack knowledge, but you cannot lack morality. You lack morality and knowledge, and your harm to humanity is hundreds or thousands of times greater than that of someone without knowledge.
So, the root of morality does not lie in the world of sensory phenomena, but in the transcendent realm of ontology. Without curbing the forgetfulness of speculative reason, rational practice, and morality, it is fundamentally impossible.
So Kant is a very positive statement, not a negative one. In Kant's view, if we have the help of pure reason, we cannot be certain that there are no values or virtues in human society, and we will be more concerned about becoming the masses. Or we have to admit that what we consider good and evil depends only on what we accidentally want.
If, as Hume said, reason is always positive, then I will use reason to argue my inclination and hobby in this regard. If morality is, in Kant's view, there can be no morality, at least he will not agree.
Kant wrote a series of books and papers to answer the question, with the first step being the foundation of his 1785 book "Metaphysics of Morals". Then, in 1882, the second critique was the Critique of Practical Reason, and finally in 1797, there was the "Metaphysics of Morals". These three works are now known as Kant's Three Books on Practical Philosophy, and their ideas were developed in his series of independent papers and incorporated into his works on religion.
Kant said that the key to moral issues lies in the necessity of assuming that we are free to practice. We must first assume that we are free, and only this assumption of freedom can ensure that we also need to start our moral practice from this premise.
It's also very important, like now we rely on the market to decide everything, I listen to the fate of the market. I will do whatever the base price is for the Chinese yuan or the US dollar. There are also Western countries like this, but they are better than us because they read more books. In fact, in China, from the Xinhai Revolution to the Communist Party before the Cultural Revolution, there were constant internal and external troubles during this period, and universities did not study well. A good and normal academic tradition was not truly established.
After the reform and opening up, regarding the content of our studies, the eight years in the 1980s were okay, but soon a new round came, all for money, and the whole tradition could not be established. If it can't be established, you have to talk about Kant. No matter how outrageous Western scholars are, he usually teaches this set of things in university because he hasn't stopped for hundreds of years, and he doesn't even speak nonsense.
And now we are led by professors to speak up, forming a situation where when you see such comments, it is often famous experts, such as the director or dean of a certain center. They say what you are telling them, but they have deceptive power over our society because there are not many people with high cultural levels in our society. The dean of Peking University does not represent any director. Why do you need to study hard now?
Because only the sunshine of truth can destroy these things, and you cannot use violent means to remove them. So, in the end, you're just saying that if there are more people in your society who can think normally, society will naturally be healthy. Society is so crazy today because there are not many people who often think.
Look at that, I have a lot of objections to the School of Journalism now, and of course, the students in the School of Journalism may also have a strong aversion to me. Why do you keep talking about me?
I'm not always talking about you, because these programs are made by you. It is reasonable to say that your basic aesthetic value is different from that of those Shanghai junior college students in the society, but their overall aesthetic taste of words is the same.
So, they work together like fish in water. What kind of hosts or people are there in the TV station now? I have also studied as a graduate student here before, and I have been back and forth with them. This group of people just read books for nothing. On the other hand, it also shows that our books are useless now. They think they may have attended one class, even if they attended 20 classes, they didn't teach it that way. They told you about the importance of advertising to the television industry, or the importance of ratings, and so on.
He won't come to talk to you about his personal moral conscience and national responsibility, because it's useless to talk about it. Why should I talk to him?
There used to be a female classmate in the journalism department. Let me tell you, you all know that the unwritten rule of the journalism department is to take money. Why are so many people taking the journalism exam?
In fact, they have a clear idea in their hearts that it's not just about finding a job in the future with profits and grey income. They know it themselves, to be honest, don't pretend to be naive with me. We don't know. Our parents asked me to take the exam, but that's not necessarily the case. I have attended several meetings, but I am not going to attend now. Some of their publishing houses hold new book launches, and when those guys come, they don't respect your experts' opinions at all. They are there with more than ten people chattering loudly, louder than your speeches. When the red envelope is released, they just laugh and leave. Moving on to the next stage, he received over a dozen red envelopes in a day, which was a considerable amount of income. He knew in his heart why the journalism department had been thriving for so long.
That's right, I'm really worried about how my female classmate is doing now. It's been about 89 years. He told me, 'Teacher, I took your class, so of course I can't accept red envelopes. I returned them the first time, the second time, and the third time.' However, he said, 'I saw that we're not going to take a professional oath.'. He said those big sisters and elders are already records. When they see it, they cover their mouths and laugh because they know what's going on. They also learned the same thing back then, to be loyal to their ethics. Whatever they want, take it. If I don't take it, why should I study journalism.
It's very clear. And then, for the third time, because they had to give money during their internship, after giving the money, of course he couldn't return it to the unit or the instructor. Their instructor's face darkened, and they really had a ferocious face. They didn't say anything in public. Do you want to work in this industry?
If you want to visit again, take the money and stop saying that the visit is okay. Give me your money and from now on, don't come to work in our industry. Just so naked to this point, he told me.
I said you didn't quit, but he said of course I quit. You know, he knows it himself. To be honest, don't come and pretend to be a little fresh with me. It seems like we don't know why he did it, because these people have extremely high exam scores. Those with high exam scores are not fools. Of course, he knows how much academic content there is inside. They don't know, they know very well. But he also said, what are people doing alive, living a good life, and what profession can live a good life? Apart from the things on the payroll, there are many invisible things that no one should teach, of course, we should live a good life.
Because the red envelopes I saw were the least lucrative among the reporters, and they were the ones that spread rumors. The reporters who run foreign trade and finance are much richer in red envelopes. When a new stock is listed and you start asking for red envelopes, running a cultural and educational campaign is the least profitable. A terrible TV drama, he even asked you to promote its high profit and low profit, but now the publishing house is really a skinny horse, trying to give you some candy. After watching it, I knew what was going on and didn't talk about him.
So, this is what Kant said. From a theoretical perspective, the news department is doing the right thing. What are people doing alive?
Isn't being a teacher also about earning money and a salary to support your family at a certain university here? I'm just like you. Well, since we both support our families, it's better to admit that it's better to earn more than less. Admit it or not, don't worry about me. I'm not breaking the law. They voluntarily give it as a transportation fee, is that okay?
Sure, if your university teacher goes to Huashi University, they will also reimburse your transportation expenses. What I brought here is not correct, okay?
Kant talks about the so-called theoretical reason here. He repeatedly tells you that while he is excluding something, he is thinking about what he is excluding?
A person's moral conscience is gone. In it, their personal concept is missing a piece, but they don't think it's missing. On the contrary, they believe they are complete. They think I have both knowledge and intention, and my emotional, intellectual, and rational abilities are sound. But you don't know that there is an important part of your rationality called moral conscience, which is practical rationality. He doesn't have it.
That female journalist, why did she withdraw three times? She's amazing. I really admire this woman. She's not easy because she has to offend many people. Others are just annoyed. If you're doing this, it's just showing off that we're not very clean. What are you, how old are you, and your family is wealthy? She must be under a lot of pressure, as we can imagine.
网友评论